The final rule is always that a donor’s appropriate to reward is unrestricted. As proven in the situation of Ranee Khajoorunissa vs. Mst. Roushan Jahan (1876), the Privy Council recognised that a donor may well present all or any part of their property, whether or not it adversely affects the https://co-ownershipandpartitionl18484.blogocial.com/transfer-of-property-wakeel-in-karachi-near-me-fundamentals-explained-67112136